Redefining Collaboration

SMBs discover the new promise and affordability of multimedia collaboration.

Global entities, virtual project teams, mobile workforces, international reach… doing business is a more networked and far-flung process than ever before.  Even small businesses need to communicate and collaborate with remote customers, colleagues and suppliers.

In the past, SMBs had limited options for remote collaboration.  Audio-conferencing on the company’s phone system was clunky.  Multimedia conferencing generally only worked inside the company network.  Internet-based, third-party meeting services put an onus on every meeting:  a price.

Now SMBs with IP-based phone systems can afford their own, full-featured multimedia conferencing system.  This is not just audio-conferencing.  You can also blend other communication types to work more as you would face-to-face, such as:

  • Document sharing—Share and present Windows documents, such as Word files, Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations and PDFs.
  • Web sharing—Co-browse Web pages with participants, navigate back and forth among Web pages, or synchronize everybody to the same page.
  • Chat—Contribute ideas and comments in a public chat session, with all participants’ messages displayed in a running dialog, or engage in private chat with selected participants.
  • Whiteboarding—Brainstorm conceptual ideas, process flows, organizational charts and more with interactive drawing and text tools.

Look for a system that doesn’t require participants to have special software or hardware, just an Internet-connected PC with standard Web browser, maybe a simple plug-in.  You shouldn’t need much in the equipment closet either, perhaps just a server connected to your existing IP PBX.

Does your organization use this type of multimedia collaboration?  What types of interactions does it enable, and what results have you seen from it?  If your organization doesn’t do this, what is holding it back?

Videoconferencing made easy

Restoring the human factor for remote collaboration

 

As technology has improved and costs have dropped, in-house videoconferencing is now feasible for even very small organizations.  With videoconferencing, you can support new levels of collaboration and teamwork among colleagues in different geographies.  Reduce travel costs without sacrificing the personal nature of interactions.  Reach remote audiences with face-to-face contact and a naturally interactive experience.

Sounds great, right?  So why has videoconferencing been so underutilized, especially in small to mid-sized businesses?

That’s easy.  In the past, videoconferencing systems were cumbersome.  Participants had to plan in advance and commit to a certain time block.  The host had to navigate a reservation system to set up the session.  Participants often had to meet in designated video-equipped locations.  And they had limited options for controlling the video session.

That was then.  Today’s videoconferencing can be about as easy to use as a telephone.  Simply select conference participants from a list, and if they’re available, you’re on.

With a friendly interface, participants can see, hear and interact with each other without having to click a mouse or push a button to start or stop their video communication.  Video calls can be managed with many of the same functions you expect of voice calls.  You can forward, transfer, park and put a video call on hold, just as you can with a voice call.

“Fine and well,” you might argue.  “But I also have to show slides, collaborate over spreadsheets, and allow everyone into the conversation.”

No problem.  With multimedia collaboration alongside your video session, you can share your Windows® desktop, applications or documents.  You can discuss and edit materials together, while talking on the phone independently of the video feed.  Send and receive text messages and related documents and images during the conference.

How does your organization support videoconferencing and multimedia collaboration today?  Do users find the system to be natural and intuitive, or is it awkward?  What would you change?